Water system
Mansfield City
EPA ID OH7002914 · Richland County · 51,000 people served · owned by a local government
Mansfield City treats its own water from Clear Fork Reservoir (Clear Fork of the Mohican River), plus 9 city wells.
The system's record
- Water bodies
- Clear Fork Reservoir, Clear Fork Mohican River
- Raw intakes
- Clear Fork River
- Active wells
- 9
- Serves
- 51,000 people · Richland County
- EPA ID
- OH7002914
Surface water from Clear Fork Reservoir is blended with water from 9 wells (4 under influence of surface water) before treatment.
About this area's water

Did you know
- Despite the reservoir's prominence, only about 22% of Mansfield's tap water is lake water - roughly 78% comes from municipal wells, and the blend shifts with algae blooms and taste-and-odor episodes.
- Potassium permanganate is dosed right at the reservoir intake for one specific job: keeping zebra mussels from colonizing the intake line.
- About 5.5 million cubic yards of silt have settled into Clear Fork Reservoir since 1949 - roughly a quarter of its capacity - and it has never once been dredged.
- Mansfield voters rejected a quarter-percent water-main income tax in November 2023, then passed the very same tax four months later by 97 votes.
History5
- 1949Clear Fork Reservoir built, impounding the Clear Fork of the Mohican River to serve Mansfield as its surface water source.
- 1960Present wastewater treatment plant went into service as a 4 MGD facility; capacity was expanded between 1984 and 1987.
- 2023-2024Voters rejected a quarter-percent water-main income tax in Nov. 2023 (5,865-5,251), then approved it in March 2024 by 97 votes (2,701-2,604).
- 2025City launched a $3.6 million water main program and recorded three treatment technique violations at the water plant, including a nine-hour turbidity violation on Jan. 2.
- 2026Stantec sediment survey found roughly 5.5 million cubic yards of silt and ~26% capacity loss, but concluded the reservoir remains dependable for at least 50 more years.
Treatment & pressure
How it is treated
Blend of surface and ground water - about 22% from the 4.4-billion-gallon Clear Fork Reservoir (24-inch line) and about 78% from municipal wells (two 18-inch lines), with the ratio set by lake clarity, algal blooms and taste/odor. Potassium permanganate at the intake controls zebra mussels; then…
Water pressure
not published; no system-wide psi figure appears in the city's plant pages or the 2025 CCR
What it costs
No per-1,000-gallon figure is published online. Utility Collections directs residents to city ordinances 937.11 (water) and 941.08 (sewer) for yearly rates and fees; the ordinance…
Water quality & impurities8
| Contaminant | Level | Limit | Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHM) Running average at 94% of the MCL; single samples ranged to 108.6 ppb | 75.0 ppb | MCL 80 | 2025 |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) Range 18.2-78.5; TTHM and HAA5 exceeded operational evaluation levels at 4 of 8 sites in Q3 | 52.5 ppb | MCL 60 | 2025 |
| Turbidity Exceeded the limit - treatment technique violation; 98.3% of samples met the standard | 2.60 NTU | TT: 1.0 NTU max | 2025 |
| Lead (90th percentile) 90th percentile well under the action level, but 1 of 31 samples exceeded 15 ppb | 1.8 ppb | AL 15 | 2025 |
| Copper (90th percentile) 0 of 31 samples over the action level | 0.2 ppm | AL 1.3 | 2025 |
| Nitrate Range 0.13-0.58; low for an agricultural watershed | 0.58 ppm | MCL 10 | 2025 |
| Combined radium From the well sources; gross alpha was 3.02 pCi/L against a 15 limit | 2.35 pCi/L | MCL 5 | 2022 |
| PFOA About 1 ppt, a quarter of the new federal limit; PFOS 0.000921 ppb, other four PFAS non-detect | 0.00102 ppb | MCL 0.004 | 2025 |
EPA compliance record
Lead at the tap: 90th-percentile result 2 ppb in 2025 (action level 15 ppb).
EPA health-based violations since 2015:
- 2025Total coliform · treatment technique violation · returned to compliance
- 2025Surface Water Treatment Rule · treatment technique violation · returned to compliance
- 2024Lead and Copper Rule (lead) · treatment technique violation · returned to compliance
- 2023Lead and Copper Rule · treatment technique violation · returned to compliance
- 2019Total coliform · treatment technique violation · returned to compliance
- 2018Lead and Copper Rule · treatment technique violation · returned to compliance
EPA's count of 7 includes 1 repeat quarterly violation of the problems listed.
8 violations of any kind logged since 2020, 3 of them paperwork (monitoring, reporting, public notice or consumer report).
Projects & plans3
Recent and current work
- Water main replacement program (4-inch to 8-inch mains) · $3.6 million · 2025 · under construction
About 14,000 feet of main, 37 hydrants and 246 reconnected homes in six areas; first phase of a 53-mile replacement need. - Clear Fork Reservoir sediment survey · $149,799 · 2026 · completed
Stantec study found ~5.5 million cubic yards of sediment and ~26% capacity loss, yet a dependable supply for 50+ years.
Planned or needed
- Continued small-diameter water main replacement (53 miles total) · 2025-2029 · planned
About three miles per year over roughly four funding cycles, paid from the 0.25% income tax generating ~$4.8 million annually.
Supply stress
Silt has claimed roughly 26% of Clear Fork Reservoir's capacity since 1949 and it has never been dredged, though a 2026 Stantec survey found 50+ years of dependable supply. Nearer-term pressures are on the treatment side: three treatment technique violations in 2025 and disinfection byproducts running close to their limits.
Sewers
Sanitary
City-operated wastewater treatment plant (not a regional district): 12 MGD average design flow, 25 MGD peak. Treatment runs equalization, bar screening, aerated grit removal, primary clarification, extended aeration in eight tanks, four final clarifiers, then chlorination and dechlorination, with anaerobic digestion and centrifuge…
Storm
Largely separate storm system - about 400 miles of storm lines, 7,200-plus catch basins and roughly 1,200 outfalls draining to 10 major waterways. No stormwater utility fee is published.
Sourcesverified
Compiled from the utility's own reports and public records, then independently re-checked against primary sources.
Main supplier in 4 ZIP codes
Serves
Main water supplier in 6 ZIP codes
- 44901 · Mansfield100% of residents
- 44902 · Mansfield100% of residents
- 44907 · Mansfield86% of residents
- 44906 · Mansfield46% of residents
- 44903 · Mansfield37% of residents
- 44905 · Madison Township and Mansfield10% of residents
Also present in 1 more ZIP code
- 44904 · Lexington and Mansfield22% of residents
Population-weighted resident shares; a ZIP code can have more than one system on record. Recomputed from each ZIP's own system list, not from the map's cached footprint.
Buys from · Sells to
Mansfield City does not buy water from another system on record; it treats its own source water.
No other system is on record buying water from Mansfield City.
Photograph
On the map
Show this system's territory on the map — 7 ZIP codes in all.
Sources
U.S. EPA SDWIS and Community Water System Service Area Boundaries (v3, 2026), Ohio EPA primacy data, 2020 census blocks: the system serving most residents, traced through purchases to the treating utility; Ohio EPA 2023 Sewer and Water Rate Survey (Ohio State, May 2025) for household bills; Ohio EPA DEFA loan awards since 2016 for the loans paragraph · EPA SDWIS · EPA service area boundaries · Ohio EPA drinking water · Ohio EPA rate survey
Mansfield City's own pages: ci.mansfield.oh.us, en.wikipedia.org