Water system
Manchester Village
EPA ID OH0100112 · Adams County · 2,043 people served · owned by a local government
Manchester Village treats its own water from Groundwater wells (2 wells).
The system's record
- Active wells
- 2
- Serves
- 2,043 people · Adams County
- EPA ID
- OH0100112
About this area's water
Did you know
- Manchester was founded in 1790 as 'Massie's Station,' the first permanent settlement in the Virginia Military District, and renamed after Manchester, England the following year -- it is also commonly cited as the fourth…
- The village's water comes from just 2 wells tapping the Ohio River aquifer beneath the town, not the river itself.
- A 2000 federal appeals court case, Adams County Regional Water District v. Village of Manchester, pitted the village against a regional rural water utility over the right to serve customers in the area.
- Amazon Web Services is evaluating a roughly 1,000-acre, 1,300-megawatt data center site near Manchester on the grounds of a former coal-plant landfill -- a project still in the proposal stage, not yet built.
History5
- 1790Founded by Nathaniel Massie as 'Massie's Station,' the first permanent settlement in the Virginia Military District; renamed Manchester (after Massie's ancestral Manchester, England) in 1791.
- 20006th Circuit decided Adams County Regional Water District v. Village of Manchester, Ohio, 226 F.3d 513, a dispute between the village and a federally indebted rural water utility over water service…
- 2010The village reportedly completed its Drinking Water Source Protection Plan, identifying a nearby trailer park's sewer lines (within 300 ft of Well #6) as a groundwater contamination risk.
- 2017-2024Manchester's annual CCR was reportedly cited nearly every year for content errors -- omitting or misreporting barium, copper, lead, chlorine, cyanide, fluoride, or HAA5 results.
- 2024-2025Reportedly failed to monitor disinfection byproducts from July-Sept 2024 (compliance restored Aug 2025) and missed the Oct 2024 federal deadline for a lead service line inventory (compliance restored…
Source: en.wikipedia.orglaw.justia.com
Treatment & pressure
How it is treated
Groundwater from 2 wells drawing on the Ohio River aquifer, reportedly treated with chlorine disinfection plus potassium permanganate for iron/manganese removal, pressure filtration through coal and silicate sand, a secondary chlorine dose, and a corrosion inhibitor before storage.
Water pressure
Not published.
What it costs
Current residential rate schedule not published in any source located; village bills water and sewer online but no per-1,000-gallon rate or fixed charge could be found.
Water quality & impurities4
| Contaminant | Level | Limit | Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate From fertilizer runoff/septic leaching; reportedly well below MCL. | 2.91 ppm | 10 | 2025 |
| TTHM (total trihalomethanes) Reported range 3.3-21.7 ppb, chlorination byproduct. | 21.7 ppb | 80 | 2025 |
| Copper (90th percentile) Reportedly 0 of 10 sites over action level; notably higher than most small Ohio systems. | 0.817 ppm | 1.3 (action… | 2025 |
| Lead (90th percentile) Reportedly 0 of 10 sites over action level. | 2.5 ppb | 15 (action… | 2025 |
Source: purewaterguys.com
EPA compliance record
Lead at the tap: 90th-percentile result 2.5 ppb in 2025 (action level 15 ppb).
EPA health-based violations since 2015:
- 2024Lead and Copper Rule Revisions · lead service line inventory missing or incomplete (a records requirement, not a lead test result) · returned to compliance
11 violations of any kind logged since 2020: 2 for required testing that was missed or reported late; 8 for a report, record or notice that was missing, late or incomplete (the yearly water quality report, a public notice, lead line records); 1 health-based.
Projects & plans1
Planned or needed
- Lead service line inventory · 2025 · completed
Reportedly missed the Oct 16, 2024 federal deadline; village reportedly returned to compliance Sept 18, 2025 (no lead/galvanized/unknown lines identified).…
Supply stress
Manchester draws groundwater from wells in the Ohio River aquifer rather than the river itself. Amazon Web Services is evaluating roughly 1,000 acres in nearby Sprigg Township, Adams County for a 1,300-megawatt data center (about 30x the county's current annual electricity use); this is a proposed/evaluated project, not yet built, and…
Source: wvxu.org
Sewers
Sanitary
The village's own Water/Sewage Department reportedly runs sanitary sewer service. We found no published details on its plant's capacity, receiving stream, or any CSO or consent decree.
Storm
Not published.
Sourcesverified
Compiled from the utility's own reports and public records, then independently re-checked against primary sources.
Main supplier in 1 ZIP code
Serves
Main water supplier in 1 ZIP code
- 45144 · Manchester48% of residents
Population-weighted resident shares; a ZIP code can have more than one system on record. Recomputed from each ZIP's own system list, not from the map's cached footprint.
Buys from · Sells to
Manchester Village does not buy water from another system on record; it treats its own source water.
No other system is on record buying water from Manchester Village.
What the records show about Manchester Village
Who runs it
EPA's record describes Manchester Village as owned by a local government. It has 850 service connections and serves 2,043 people.
EPA classes it as a community water system, one that serves the same residents all year.
EPA's record says it has substantially implemented source water protection under Ohio's program, dating the program from 2025. Its office telephone on EPA's record is 937-549-2375.
Source: EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), water system record.
How the water is treated
EPA's treatment table registers these steps for Manchester Village: corrosion control, chlorine disinfection, and iron and manganese removal.
The list is what each system registered with EPA for treatment plants EPA still shows as active, and it can lag a plant upgrade.
Source: EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) treatment table (EPA Envirofacts, pulled September 2026).
Violations
EPA counts 1 health-based violation for Manchester Village since 2015. Health-based means a contaminant above its legal limit or a required treatment step not carried out. It falls into 1 separate problem (one contaminant or rule in one year); the table lists it.
EPA logs 11 violations of any kind since 2020: 2 for required testing that was missed or reported late; 8 for a report, record or notice that was missing, late or incomplete (the yearly water quality report, a public notice, lead line records); 1 health-based.
| Year | Contaminant or rule | Kind | Measured | Limit | Status in EPA's record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Lead and Copper Rule Revisions | lead service line inventory missing or incomplete (a records requirement, not a lead test result) | not on file | not on file | returned to compliance |
Source: EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) violation records: health-based violations with compliance periods beginning in 2015 or later, all violations from 2020 or later (EPA Envirofacts, pulled September 2026).
Lead and copper at the tap
In the sampling period ending December 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at Manchester Village was 2.5 ppb, under both the current 15 ppb action level and the 10 ppb level that applies from 2027.
The highest result on file is 4 ppb, in the period ending December 2024.
EPA has 9 sampling periods on file for Manchester Village since 2016, the first ending in 2016; no period was above 10 ppb.
Every water system has to inventory its service lines, the pipes from the main to each building. In the inventory Manchester Village sent EPA, 966 lines are counted.
| Material | Lines |
|---|---|
| Lead | 0 |
| Galvanized, needing replacement | 0 |
| Unknown material | 0 |
| Not lead | 966 |
| All lines | 966 |
Systems sample taps in the homes most likely to have lead pipes or solder. The 90th-percentile result is the level nine in ten of the sampled homes were at or below. Lead comes mostly from service lines and house plumbing, not the source water, so a low result for the system does not clear an old house.
EPA's dashboard status for this inventory: reported all required service line types.
Source: EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) lead and copper 90th-percentile results (EPA Envirofacts), sampling periods ending 2016 or later; EPA's service line inventory dashboard, Ohio's 2026 Q2 submission.
PFAS
Ohio EPA's own statewide sampling tested 1 plant of Manchester Village (latest sample June 2020). Not one of the six PFAS tested (PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS) was detected.
Ohio EPA's current sampling status map lists 1 plant of Manchester Village as sampled, most recently February 2026.
PFAS are the 'forever chemicals' from firefighting foam, plating shops and non-stick coatings. Results are for water leaving the plant, not your tap.
Source: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data (final release, August 2026); Ohio EPA statewide PFAS sampling, 2019 to 2021, and its sampling status map.
Disinfection byproducts
Chlorine that disinfects water also reacts with organic matter to form byproducts. Two groups have federal limits: total trihalomethanes (TTHM, 80 µg/L) and five haloacetic acids (HAA5, 60 µg/L), judged on running yearly averages at each sampling site.
For TTHM, the average of Manchester Village's samples in 2019, the last year it was sampled, was 19.2 µg/L. The worst yearly average was 25.6 µg/L and the highest single sample was 43.1 µg/L, from 14 samples taken from 2013 to 2019.
For HAA5, the average in the last year sampled was 3 µg/L. The worst yearly average was 4.3 µg/L and the highest single sample was 8.6 µg/L, from 14 samples.
| Byproduct | Limit | Latest yearly average | Worst yearly average | Highest sample | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 80 µg/L | 19.2 µg/L (2019) | 25.6 µg/L | 43.1 µg/L | 14 |
| HAA5 | 60 µg/L | 3 µg/L | 4.3 µg/L | 8.6 µg/L | 14 |
A yearly average of 0 means nothing was detected in that year's samples. EPA's file stops at 2019; Ohio EPA's Drinking Water Watch has newer results.
Source: EPA Six-Year Review 4 compliance monitoring data, 2012 to 2019, distribution-system samples (non-detects counted as zero).
Nitrate, arsenic and radioactivity
Nitrate: the highest of 10 samples was 5.4 mg/L (as nitrogen) in 2013; in 2019, the last year sampled, the highest was 4.56 mg/L. No sample was over the limit of 10 mg/L. Nitrate above 10 is unsafe for infants.
Arsenic was not detected in 2 samples (limit 10 µg/L).
| Contaminant | Samples | Highest result | Limit | Samples over limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate (as nitrogen) | 10 | 5.4 mg/L | 10 mg/L | 0 |
| Arsenic | 2 | not detected | 10 µg/L | 0 |
Measured in finished water: at the plant's entry points and in the distribution system; raw well and intake samples are left out. Non-detects count as zero.
Source: EPA Six-Year Review 4 compliance monitoring data, 2012 to 2019, finished water.
Solvents and fuels
EPA's file holds results for all six solvent and fuel compounds it checked. Benzene, carbon tetrachloride, 1,2-dichloroethane, trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, and vinyl chloride were not detected in 2 samples each.
| Compound | Limit | Samples | Detected in | Highest result | Samples over limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benzene | 5 µg/L | 2 | 0 of 2 | not detected | 0 |
| Carbon tetrachloride | 5 µg/L | 2 | 0 of 2 | not detected | 0 |
| 1,2-dichloroethane | 5 µg/L | 2 | 0 of 2 | not detected | 0 |
| Trichloroethylene (TCE) | 5 µg/L | 2 | 0 of 2 | not detected | 0 |
| Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) | 5 µg/L | 2 | 0 of 2 | not detected | 0 |
| Vinyl chloride | 2 µg/L | 2 | 0 of 2 | not detected | 0 |
"Not detected" means the lab's result was below what its method can measure, not that the compound is absent. Non-detects count as zero in the highest-result column.
Source: EPA Six-Year Review 4 compliance monitoring data, 2012 to 2019, finished water.
Farm chemicals and metals
EPA's file holds results for all nine herbicides and metals it checked. Detected: barium in 2 of 2 samples, highest 68.5 µg/L (limit 2,000). Not detected: atrazine in 2 samples, alachlor in 2 samples, 2,4-D in 3 samples, chromium in 2 samples, cadmium in 2 samples, mercury in 2 samples, selenium in 2 samples, thallium in 2 samples.
| Substance | Kind | Limit | Samples | Detected in | Highest result | Samples over limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrazine | Farm chemical | 3 µg/L | 2 | 0 of 2 | not detected | 0 |
| Alachlor | Farm chemical | 2 µg/L | 2 | 0 of 2 | not detected | 0 |
| 2,4-D | Farm chemical | 70 µg/L | 3 | 0 of 3 | not detected | 0 |
| Chromium | Metal | 100 µg/L | 2 | 0 of 2 | not detected | 0 |
| Cadmium | Metal | 5 µg/L | 2 | 0 of 2 | not detected | 0 |
| Barium | Metal | 2,000 µg/L | 2 | 2 of 2 | 68.5 µg/L | 0 |
| Mercury | Metal | 2 µg/L | 2 | 0 of 2 | not detected | 0 |
| Selenium | Metal | 50 µg/L | 2 | 0 of 2 | not detected | 0 |
| Thallium | Metal | 2 µg/L | 2 | 0 of 2 | not detected | 0 |
Non-detects count as zero in the highest-result column.
Source: EPA Six-Year Review 4 compliance monitoring data, 2012 to 2019, finished water.
Bacteria in the pipes
From 2012 to 2019, 0 of 192 routine total coliform samples taken in the distribution system at Manchester Village tested positive (0%); in 2019, the last year on file, 0 of 24 did.
A positive coliform test is a warning sign, not a violation by itself. E. coli is a sign that human or animal waste may have reached the water. Coliform counts are routine samples only; E. coli counts include repeat samples.
Source: EPA Six-Year Review 4 compliance monitoring data, 2012 to 2019, distribution-system presence/absence tests for total coliform and E. coli.
Fluoride
The Ohio Department of Health's report to the CDC (My Water's Fluoride) says Manchester Village has fluoride from natural sources, but at a level below what is recommended for preventing tooth decay, and does not adjust it. The level it reports is 0.15 mg/L.
EPA's treatment table lists no fluoridation step at Manchester Village.
Measured fluoride: none was detected in 2 samples at the plant's entry points in 2012 to 2019.
The recommended level for preventing tooth decay is 0.7 mg/L; the federal limit is 4 mg/L. The treatment list is what each system registered with EPA and can lag a plant upgrade.
Source: CDC My Water's Fluoride (fluoridation status as reported by the Ohio Department of Health, fetched September 2026); EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) treatment table; EPA Six-Year Review 4 compliance monitoring data, 2012 to 2019, entry-point fluoride samples.
How well the service area is mapped
EPA estimated the service area of Manchester Village with a computer model rather than drawing it from the utility's map, so its edges are approximate.
Counting the people who live in the ZIP codes it overlaps, this atlas estimates 1,864 residents are inside the boundary, 91% of the 2,043 people Manchester Village reports serving.
The resident count is an estimate from 2020 Census ZIP-code populations, not a count of customers.
Source: EPA Service Area Boundaries; resident estimate by this atlas from ZIP-code overlap.
Photograph
On the map
Show this system's territory on the map — 1 ZIP code in all.
Sources
U.S. EPA SDWIS and Community Water System Service Area Boundaries (v3, 2026), Ohio EPA primacy data, 2020 census blocks: the system serving most residents, traced through purchases to the treating utility; Ohio EPA 2023 Sewer and Water Rate Survey (Ohio State, May 2025) for household bills; Ohio EPA DEFA loan awards since 2016 for the loans paragraph · EPA SDWIS · EPA service area boundaries · Ohio EPA drinking water · Ohio EPA rate survey
EPA's own record for this system: Enforcement and Compliance History report for OH0100112 (EPA ECHO).
Notable facts: en.wikipedia.org, wvxu.org, law.justia.com
History: en.wikipedia.org, law.justia.com
Water quality: purewaterguys.com
Supply stress: wvxu.org
