One entry in a record in office

Keith Faber: At a Westerville Tea Party event, floated a speculative theory that Cuyahoga County's elections board could be diverting special ballot-printing paper to enable fraudulent ballot production; no evidence was produced and county officials disputed it.

Statement · October 2022

StatementFiled as

Correct this page · hello@crackedbuckeye.com

What this is

This is one of 10 dated entries in Keith Faber's record in office on this site, filed as a statement dated October 2022. The sentence above is the entry as this site states it; anyone else's reading of it is listed below in their words.

Every field this record holds

The entry as it is stored, field by field. Nothing here is computed.

Date
2022-10
Evaluations
Cuyahoga County Elections Director Anthony Perlatti, reported by Ohio Capital Journal
https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/2022/10/20/special-paper-ohio-auditor-floats-theory-of-election-fraud/
Said
his office does no such thing
Url
https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/2022/10/20/special-paper-ohio-auditor-floats-theory-of-election-fraud/
Kind
statement
What
At a Westerville Tea Party event, floated a speculative theory that Cuyahoga County's elections board could be diverting special ballot-printing paper to enable fraudulent ballot production; no evidence was produced and county officials disputed it.

Where this appears

The pages and figures this entry is drawn in.

Sources

Where the numbers above came from, in the record's own order.

  1. 'Special paper.' Ohio Auditor floats theory of election fraud · Ohio Capital Journal · 2022-10-20 · accessed 2026-09-19

Cite and data

Cite this page as:

Cracked Buckeye, "Keith Faber: At a Westerville Tea Party event, floated a speculative theory that Cuyahoga County's elections board could be diverting special ballot-printing paper to enable fraudulent ballot production; no evidence was produced and county officials disputed it.", https://crackedbuckeye.com/people/keith-faber/record/2022-10-at-a-westerville-tea/, built 2026-11-03, accessed [date].

How to cite · Report a correction · Built 2026-11-03