One entry in a record in office
William M. O'Neill: Wrote a dissenting opinion in Pauley v. Circleville, 2013-Ohio-4541, arguing that the city's recreational-user immunity should not have shielded it from a claim over a debris pile in a city park.
Ruling · October 16, 2013
RulingFiled as
What this is
This is one of 3 dated entries in William M. O'Neill's record in office on this site, filed as a ruling dated October 16, 2013. The sentence above is the entry as this site states it; anyone else's reading of it is listed below in their words.
Every field this record holds
The entry as it is stored, field by field. Nothing here is computed.
- Date
- 2013-10-16
- Kind
- ruling
- What
- Wrote a dissenting opinion in Pauley v. Circleville, 2013-Ohio-4541, arguing that the city's recreational-user immunity should not have shielded it from a claim over a debris pile in a city park.
Where this appears
The pages and figures this entry is drawn in.
Sources
Where the numbers above came from, in the record's own order.
- Pauley v. Circleville, 137 Ohio St.3d 212, 2013-Ohio-4541 · Supreme Court of Ohio · 2013-10-16 · accessed 2026-09-24
Cite and data
Cite this page as:
Cracked Buckeye, "William M. O'Neill: Wrote a dissenting opinion in Pauley v. Circleville, 2013-Ohio-4541, arguing that the city's recreational-user immunity should not have shielded it from a claim over a debris pile in a city park.", https://crackedbuckeye.com/people/william-o-neill/record/2013-10-16-wrote-a-dissenting-opinion/, built 2026-10-31, accessed [date].
How to cite · Report a correction · Built 2026-10-31
