One entry in a record in office
Judith Ann Lanzinger: Wrote a dissenting opinion in Daniel v. Daniel, 2014-Ohio-1161, arguing that the case had been improvidently accepted and that unvested pensions are not marital property under Ohio law.
Ruling · March 26, 2014
RulingFiled as
What this is
This is one of 3 dated entries in Judith Ann Lanzinger's record in office on this site, filed as a ruling dated March 26, 2014. The sentence above is the entry as this site states it; anyone else's reading of it is listed below in their words.
Every field this record holds
The entry as it is stored, field by field. Nothing here is computed.
- Date
- 2014-03-26
- Kind
- ruling
- What
- Wrote a dissenting opinion in Daniel v. Daniel, 2014-Ohio-1161, arguing that the case had been improvidently accepted and that unvested pensions are not marital property under Ohio law.
Where this appears
The pages and figures this entry is drawn in.
Sources
Where the numbers above came from, in the record's own order.
- Daniel v. Daniel, 139 Ohio St.3d 275, 2014-Ohio-1161 · Supreme Court of Ohio · 2014-03-26 · accessed 2026-09-24
Cite and data
Cite this page as:
Cracked Buckeye, "Judith Ann Lanzinger: Wrote a dissenting opinion in Daniel v. Daniel, 2014-Ohio-1161, arguing that the case had been improvidently accepted and that unvested pensions are not marital property under Ohio law.", https://crackedbuckeye.com/people/judith-ann-lanzinger/record/2014-03-26-wrote-a-dissenting-opinion/, built 2026-10-31, accessed [date].
How to cite · Report a correction · Built 2026-10-31
